Decision 26001
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 26001 | Forget | English | 1994-11-21 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | loss of employment | definition |
Summary:
The jurisprudence is clear that a period of suspension is tangible proof of misconduct. The Board erred in law when it refused to equate suspension to a loss of employment and accordingly made an erroneous finding of fact.