Decision 25585
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 25585 | Strayer | English | 1994-10-24 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| labour dispute | conditions required for exemption |
Summary:
The conditions in ss. 31(2) must be read conjunctively. The word "or" is used simply to indicate that if claimant is doing any one of these things then he may be disentitled. If there is any ambiguity, the French text is clear that claimant must prove the enumerated three things.