| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
binding judgments |
|
Summary:
The Board refused to proceed with the appeal, simply stating that, in a previous ruling a year earlier, the claimant was given benefits, that the ruling was not appealed and it concluded that it was bound by the precedent. This is an error, both in fact and law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
interruption |
short period of time |
Summary:
Full-time student applying for benefits over the Christmas break from 11-12 to 4-1. The limitation placed on his availability for work was such as to make any job search redundant. The short period of availability in a restricted work market cannot be seriously considered as qualifying him for UI.
