Decision 25488
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 25488 | Cullen | English | 1994-10-17 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | vacation pay | in any other case |
Summary:
Claimant submits that the dates supplied for the allocation of the vacation pay are "hind-sight". In that respect he is correct. However, that is what the Regulations mandate. Ss. 58(8) is clear that the vacation pay is to be allocated according to when payable and not when it was actually paid.