| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
refusal to obey orders |
|
|
Summary:
It was undoubtedly wrong for claimant to lie to his supervisor that he had carried out a direction when he had not done so. It is hard to see this as other than a minor misfeasance in the career of a store manager (7 years) who was hard pressed on a particular day for circumstances beyond control.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
definition |
|
|
Summary:
The Board simply equated a lie with misconduct. When the finding of misconduct by statute automatically results in complete denial of benefits, a higher standard than this must surely be applied.
