Decision 25455
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 25455 | Hollingworth | English | 1994-10-13 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| week of unemployment | work without earnings |
Summary:
CEIC's argument: performing services which are generally performed for remuneration. Most unusual to work full weeks for a long time for a profit-making enterprise without pay. In the same position as one who is paid. This is a very clear case of a claimant not unemployed and not entitled to UI.