| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
proof |
need for an explanation |
|
Summary:
Jurisprudence has uniformly held that when a statement has been determined to be false or misleading, the claimant must assume the burden of proof by offering a reasonable explanation, to prove that the statement was not made knowingly. The claimant was unable to discharge this burden of proof.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
proof |
need for an explanation |
weight |
Summary:
He claims that he was forced to act in this way, that all construction workers are subject to this scourge of accumulation of hours worked. I am of the opinion that a claimant may not evade s. 33 by transferring responsibility for his acts to a third party in order to exonerate himself.
