Decision 25420
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 25420 | Marin | English | 1994-10-07 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| voluntarily leaving employment | just cause | obligation to care for family member |
Summary:
The CEIC argued that a daughter-in-law is not a child under 28(4)(e). Claimant's presence in Vancouver was certainly not urgent as 3 months elapsed before she moved. No medical evidence. Just cause not shown failing other employment. [Note: new ss. 54(1.1) includes such person for another purpose.]