| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
criminal acts |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant was in a position of trust as a bookkeeper. She took advantage of her position by failing to implement a garnishment against her own wages. This made the employer liable to show cause and pay out of his own pocket. That she was acquitted of theft from employer in the Court is not relevant.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
misjudgment |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant was in a position of trust as a bookkeeper. She took advantage of her position by failing to implement a garnishment against her own wages. An "error of judgment" of the deliberate sort found and admitted here, is no refuge in which to escape clear acts of unmistakable misconduct.
