Decision 25198
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 25198 | Teitelbaum | English | 1994-09-08 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| penalties | imposed to employer |
Summary:
Exhibits on file clearly indicate that the substitution of shortage of work instead of dismissal was done with the knowledge and consent of both parties at the request of the claimant and with the consent of the employer. Held that a penalty was correctly imposed on the employer under 33(2).