| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
weight of statements |
|
Summary:
The Board did not take into account the statutory declarations made by the co-owner and the claimant herself. The fact that the Board totally set aside two statutory declarations constitutes an error in law. (CUB 22722).
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
contradictory |
|
Summary:
A longstanding and abundant jurisprudence has clearly established that a Board must give much more weight to initial and spontaneous statements made before disentitlement than to subsequent statements made in an attempt to justify the ex-post facto actions which led to to the disentitlement.
