| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
hearings |
attendance of third party |
|
Summary:
Held that neither the Board nor the Commission are obligated to notify claimant's legal counsel of the Board's decision if counsel as not supplied the Commission with the required authorization in accordance with the Privacy and Access Act.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
natural justice |
notice of hearing |
|
Summary:
Jurisprudence provides that the fact that a Board of Referees held a hearing in the claimant's absence does not constitute a violation of the "audi aletram partem" rule if claimant was notified of the date and time of hearing in a reasonable period of time, except if he can motivate his absence.
