| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| courses of instruction or training |
failure to attend |
leaving the course |
|
Summary:
Claimant became frustrated with the way his course was being conducted and left 4 weeks before termination. Certainly, these are not grievances to be settled in UI hearings, and under the jurisprudence could be considered as personal reasons for quitting rather than as good cause.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
hearings |
attendance of third party |
|
Summary:
Claimant left the course because he was frustrated with the way the course was being conducted. There is not any lack of natural justice, in the legal sense, in the Board not requiring one of the instructors to testify as claimant wished him to do. The Board has no autority to issue subpoenas.
