| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| parental benefits |
extension of maximum |
|
|
Summary:
Although the Act clearly states that both criteria must be met, the literature does not include the word "and" between the two requirements. The Board found that the claimant had been severely misled and allowed 5 additional weeks of parental benefits. The Board erred in law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
guidelines from the Commission |
|
Summary:
Although the Act clearly states that both criteria must be met, the literature does not include the word "and" between the two requirements. The Board found that the claimant had been severely misled and allowed the additional 5 weeks of parental benefits. The Board erred in law.
