Decision 24405
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 24405 | Marin | English | 1994-05-27 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | negligence |
Summary:
The Board held that carelessness does not have to be intentional, that it is sufficient that it be within the employee's control and responsibility. It is obvious that this test is not the test applied in TUCKER. The Board has erred in its application of the law.