| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
court judgments or out-of-court settlements |
|
|
Summary:
The settlement reinstated the claimant but did not reinstate the wages and benefits between the date of firing and the date of reinstatement. The appeal was allowed solely because of the findings of an arbitration board hearing which the Board considered as binding and tying its hands. Error in law.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
acts of violence |
|
|
Summary:
There was misconduct in this matter; striking a supervisor is certainly not the kind of conduct which can be said to be acceptable. It is recognized by the arbitrator and by the Corporation that it did merit some period of suspension of salary even if there was an agreement to reinstate him.
