| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
types of claims |
|
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0244.94
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
loss of employment |
definition |
|
Summary:
The Board found that the 3-week suspension was not a loss of employment. Error in law. The evidence was clear that he left work without explanation and the law is clear that the resulting suspension constituted a loss of employment (CUB 21951). However, this does not dispose of the matter.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification |
applicability |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0244.94
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
rules of construction |
intent and object |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0244.94
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification |
rationale |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0244.94
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
employment |
last |
Summary:
Refer to: A-0244.94
