Decision 24271
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 24271 | Haddad | English | 1994-04-15 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability for work | incompatible situations | imprisonment |
Summary:
Claimant says he was eligible for pre-release and therefore available. Section 55 provides that an inmate granted parole would not be disentitled. Claimant did not apply for and was not granted a parole of any kind. There is a clear distinction between being eligible for and being granted pre-release.