Decision 23390
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 23390 | Strayer | English | 1993-11-03 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Allowed | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
voluntarily leaving employment | just cause | obligation to care for a child |
Summary:
Claimant stated that shift work was creating problems for her in caring for her daughter who had to be with her at the day care centre (at work) part of the time. I do not think the Board had adequate regard to the test now defined in 28(4) and the clause "obligation to care for a child".