Decision 23335
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 23335 | Denault | French | 1993-10-29 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| reconsideration of claim | authority to review | time limitation |
Summary:
Referred to BRIÈRE and LAFOREST. The record does not show that the claimant was ever duly notified of the amount of the overpayment. In my opinion, EIC has not satisfied the requirements of ss. 43(1) of the Act, namely to calculate the amount properly paid and to notify the claimant of this amount.