Decision 23333A
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 23333A | Marin | English | 1994-02-25 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| reconsideration of claim | material fact | mistake as to a | new facts to BOR, Umpire or Commission |
Summary:
Claimant seeks to have the Umpire specifically "name the CEIC as the offending party in the violation of the Privacy Act". A material fact under s.86 and CUB_7349 is one that can affect the outcome of the appeal in an essential and fundamental way. The request, even if allowed, would not do this.