| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
court judgments or out-of-court settlements |
|
|
Summary:
Without prejudice rule raised. Held that the statement "The terms of this settlement shall not be referred to in any subsequent proceedings between the parties" does not apply to proceedings before the Umpire, not being between the employer and the claimant. New facts allowed as part of the record.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
new facts |
definition |
|
Summary:
Without prejudice rule raised. Held that the statement "The terms of this settlement shall not be referred to in any subsequent proceedings between the parties" does not apply to proceedings before the Umpire, not being between the employer and the claimant. New facts allowed as part of the record.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
jurisdiction |
evidence new |
|
Summary:
It has been held that s. 86 does not restrict each particular entity, i.e., Commission, Board or Umpire to rescinding or amending only its own specific decisions, but that any decision made by any entity may be affected by the presentation of new facts, or on the other listed grounds.
