| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
own misconduct |
|
|
Summary:
The Board is correct in saying that the misconduct must have been committed by claimant. The fact however that others may also have been negligent does not absolve claimant from responsibility unless the conduct of that other is such as to make claimant's conduct not wilful, negligent or careless.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
dereliction of duty |
railway workers |
|
Summary:
The Board is correct in saying that the misconduct must have been committed by claimant. However, the fact that others may also have been negligent does not absolve claimant from responsibility unless the conduct of that other is such as to make claimant's conduct not wilful, negligent or careless.
