Decision 22901
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 22901 | Denault | French | 1993-09-16 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| labour dispute | directly interested | construction trade decree |
Summary:
Foreman laid off. Because of the labour dispute, he did not have anyone to supervise. He belonged to a union (CSD) that was not taking part in the negotiations. He was a unionized employee governed by the Construction Decree, and therefore might derive a benefit from the settlement of the dispute.