| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
real estate salespersons |
|
|
Summary:
Real estate agent devoting time and energy in selling real estate; he answered in the negative to a very simple question in filling out his benefit claims. He must have known or should have known that this question was more concerned with his schedule than with his method of remuneration.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
real estate salespersons |
|
|
Summary:
Real estate agent; UIC erred in basing its decision on ss. 44(1), rather than para. 43(1)(b). DOMINIQUE explained. It is unacceptable that UIC would give the claimant a notice citing s. 44 and subsequently indicate, in its submissions to the Board, that it was a case of application of ss. 43(1).
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision not to reconsider |
|
Summary:
Real estate agent; UIC erred in basing its decision on ss. 44(1), rather than para. 43(1)b). DOMINIQUE explained. It is unacceptable that UIC would give the claimant a notice citing s. 44 and subsequently indicate, in its submissions to the Board, that it was a case of application of ss. 43(1).
