Decision 22610
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 22610 | Rothstein | English | 1993-05-20 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | hearings | tape-recording |
Summary:
While his assertions regarding the turning off of the tape recording device could leave the impression that the Board had refused to hear relevant evidence, an appellant must do more than make a general statement. He must bring forward examples of relevant evidence that the Board refused to hear.