Decision 22466B
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 22466B | Tremblay-Lamer | French | 1994-05-18 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| reconsideration of claim | material fact | without knowledge of | new facts to BOR, Umpire or Commission |
Summary:
The attorneys erroneously checked the box indicating "hearing not requested"; their client had requested a hearing. According to CEIC, we must comply with section 86. It is my opinion that a clerical error regarding the necessity for a hearing is an essential fact that was not known to me at the time of the decision.