| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
charter |
|
Summary:
Claimant argues that s.26 (course referrals) discriminates against her in the context of infringing rights guaranteed by ss.15(1) of the Charter. There can be no question that the Board acted correctly in declining to entertain any charter argument per se. See TÉTREAULT-GADOURY.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| courses of instruction or training |
charter |
legislation |
|
Summary:
A decision as to whether to refer one to a course is discretionary with the CEIC and cannot be demanded as of right. Hence, I cannot accept that s.26 somehow discriminates against claimant as to her rights under ss.15(1) of the Charter. Any distinction relates to legitimate qualification standards.
