| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
vacation pay |
specific period |
|
Summary:
Ceased work due to strike in 4-90. In 1-91, the employer and the union reached an agreement for the payment of vacation pay. The Board held that the allocation should be made prior to 1-91 since vacation had to be taken between 1-1-90 to 31-12-90. Held that para. 58(8)(b) applies instead.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
vacation pay |
definition |
|
Summary:
Claimant contends that the monies are not vacation pay, that the payments were not made pursuant to the expired collective agreement, they were the result of negotiations and were made gratuitously in the hope of reducing the tension from the labour dispute. No evidence to support this.
