| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision not to reconsider |
|
Summary:
Restriction: no nights. Decision: considered employed to full extent of availability. It is now suggested by CEIC that allowing a 5-week period would have been reasonable. This has never been discussed and assumes that she would have refused after warning to broaden her job search.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
hours of work |
|
Summary:
Claimant was entitled for some time to seek work of the type lost (part-time, no night shifts). If such was not available and the CEIC gave her notice that she was, because of this, unduly restricting and she refused to broaden her job search, there would have been reason to disqualify her.
