Decision 22196
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 22196 | Reed | English | 1992-12-18 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | vacation pay | as income |
Summary:
Claimant gives his reasons why UI provisions relating to vacation pay are unfair. I must say I agree with this criticism. To treat accumulated vacation pay paid out on termination as earnings during the period of unemployment is both conceptually and logically offensive. Umpire has no discretion.