| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
allocation |
from week of layoff |
|
Summary:
Last day worked 31-7-90. Ceased due to strike. End of strike 4-11-90. Lay-off notices also effective that date. It is argued that vacation pay should have been paid 7 days after 31-7 rather than in 11-90. There was sufficient evidence to hold that the lay-off or separation occurred on 4-11-90.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
from employer |
|
Summary:
The collective agreement was not made part of the evidence. All we have is a hearsay statement of somebody's interpretation of what the collective agreement said with respect to a very important point. While this evidence may be admissible, it is entitled to very little, if any, tangible weight.
