Decision 22178
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 22178 | Bourgeois | English | 1992-12-10 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | unexcused absences from work |
Summary:
There is substantial evidence that claimant was absent from work on numerous occasions and he had been warned that unless he corrected this or unless he could produce a medical certificate justifying this absenteeism, he would be dismissed. I am satisfied that misconduct is clearly established.