| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
union activities |
|
|
Summary:
The Board found that claimant never stated categorically that he had never engaged in union activities during working hours and on company premises. It found that he had difficulty in separating his union activities and his organizing responsibilities from his day-to-day work responsibilities.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
evidence new |
|
Summary:
At one point during the hearing, claimant's representative attempted to introduce in the record a decision by the Labour Board. Commission counsel objected to the introduction of such evidence which came to light after the Board's decision. This objection was well founded in law.
