| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
court judgments or out-of-court settlements |
|
|
Summary:
Without prejudice rule examined and discussed. Settlement agreement providing for general damages contained a without prejudice caution and is not admissible in evidence as proof that the loss of employment was not due to the claimant's misconduct. Consequently, they are not new facts under s.86.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
new facts |
definition |
|
Summary:
Without prejudice rule examined and discussed. Settlement agreement providing for general damages contained a without prejudice caution and is not admissible in evidence as proof that the loss of employment was not due to the claimant's misconduct. Consequently, they are not new facts under s.86.
