Decision 21951

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 21951   Teitelbaum  English 1992-10-15
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
misconduct  applicability 

Summary:

The loss of employment contemplated in ss. 28(1) is that which gives rise to a claim for UI. It refers to the time period prior to the claim for UI. Once claimant is granted UI, he cannot lose his employment a second time for misconduct or any other cause.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
misconduct  loss of employment  definition 

Summary:

Suspended 3 days for misconduct. Disqualified for 7 weeks with reduction of benefit rate. I am not convinced that the Board erred in law in concluding that a 3-day suspension with a subsequent return to work cannot be considered a cessation of employment as contemplated in 28(1).


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
voluntarily leaving employment  applicability  employment  last 

Summary:

The loss of employment contemplated in ss. 28(1) is that which gives rise to a claim for UI. It refers to the time period prior to the claim for UI. Once claimant is granted UI, he cannot lose his employment a second time for misconduct or any other cause.


Date modified: