Decision 21937
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 21937 | Reed | English | 1992-10-15 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability for work | absences from home | personal reasons |
Summary:
It seems that the Board disqualified him because he was not physically present in the Kamloops area. This is not a proper application of the law. A person can be available for work and be looking for work, as claimant was, without necessarily being physically present in the area.