| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
courses of study |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant said that she answered 'no' because she was told by the CEIC that it was not necessary to report a course of less than 20 hours a week. The majority Board set out this explanation without any express disapprobation. The issue is whether the explanation was credible.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
requiring or refusing a document |
|
Summary:
Boards should not refuse to file evidence which claimants ask to file. They may feel that the evidence tendered is not relevant. Then it is far wiser to file the material and then assess whether they will give it much weight. Otherwise there is ground for quashing the decision.
