| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
health reasons |
|
|
Summary:
The Board erred in law by failing to apply the statutory test prescribed by 28(4)(d), namely whether claimant had no reasonable alternative to immediately leaving, having regard to all the circumstances, including working conditions constituting a danger to health or safety.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
just cause |
definition |
|
Summary:
The proverbial "reasonable man" test of the earlier jurisprudence and the risk of "unemployment" test enunciated by TANGUAY must be regarded as being supplanted by the statutory test prescribed by s. 28(4). In my view, the appropriate test now is that mentioned therein.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
misinterpretation of provision |
|
Summary:
The Board erred in law by failing to apply the statutory test prescribed by 28(4)(d), namely whether claimant had no reasonable alternative to immediately leaving, having regard to all the circumstances, including working conditions constituting a danger to health or safety.
