| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
observations from the Commission |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission put on file oblique statements by CEIC employees that this employer had had employer/employee difficulties in the past. No further information is provided. This kind of material is most improper and without some specifics being provided it is highly prejudicial.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
req'd |
Summary:
With respect to any error of fact, I cannot reverse the Board on this ground unless the Board based its decision on an erroneous finding of fact "that it made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material before it". Unable to see any such error of fact.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
board of referees |
statement of facts |
as a requirement |
Summary:
Unfortunately, as is all too common with Board decisions, the Board simply summarizes or paraphrases documents and statements provided to it and then suddenly states a conclusion without any statement as to its findings of fact material to that conclusion.
