Decision 21674
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 21674 | Walsh | English | 1992-09-23 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | criminal acts |
Summary:
The Board's decision does not appear to contain any error in law. Claimant charged with hit-and-run which he denies. The employer allegedly had statements from 3 witnesses, and also markings on the vehicle indicative that a slight accident had taken place which he did not report.