Decision 21653
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 21653 | Walsh | English | 1992-09-22 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | income | elected or appointed representative |
Summary:
Claimant states that 4 years ago the CEIC told him that he need not declare his alderman's indemnity. Whether this was a misunderstanding, it clearly cannot change the law and the indemnity, except expenses, would have to be allocated. A long line of jurisprudence supports this.