Decision 21626
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 21626 | Denault | French | 1992-09-21 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | rules of construction | official wordings differ |
Summary:
It is clear that the French version contains an error. This is the interpretation that must be given to these texts. This position agrees with that taken by the Supreme Court in CLARKE: resort may be had to the true meaning consistent with its objectives.