Decision 21609

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 21609   Dubé  English 1992-09-17
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties  proof 

Summary:

Penalty imposed because claimant said shortage of work instead of quitting. There is no evidence regarding the false statement: report card, UI claim or statements. The burden is on the Commission to show that he made a misleading statement. It has failed to do so.


Date modified: