Decision 21604
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 21604 | Strayer | English | 1992-09-17 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returned to a different Board | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | jurisdiction | adjournment of hearing |
Summary:
Claimant had been present both other times but was not for the 3rd sitting. To justify a decision to proceed, a Board should carefully record its reasons for refusing an adjournment or otherwise explain this unusual circumstance. The Board failed to do this.