| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
cards signed by third party |
|
|
Summary:
Report cards and warrants carried a signature that looked like claimant's. He has to prove that they were not signed by him or someone on his behalf. They were mailed from and to the address he had given and they were signed and cashed. Handwriting analysis done.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
decision incomplete |
|
Summary:
The Board's decision is wholly inadequate. The Board declined to decide the issue, stating it had no ability to determine whether report cards and warrants were forged and therefore upholding the Commission's decision.
