Decision 21505
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 21505 | Dubé | French | 1992-09-08 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| misconduct | court judgments or out-of-court settlements |
Summary:
In fact, the preponderance of evidence came from the employer, the insured wanting to keep his own for his grievance. The Board and adjudication are two distinct entities: the decision of one must not void that of the other. The Board is limited to the evidence before it.