Decision 21398
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 21398 | Strayer | English | 1992-08-21 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| voluntarily leaving employment | applicability | voluntary layoff |
Summary:
It is not disputed that the business was obliged to cut expenditures. Claimant was given the choice as to whether he continued through the winter on reduced hours and pay or whether he quit. He himself said that he chose to stop because he would make more on UI.