| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
union activities |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant stressed that union activities are permitted and not a ground for dismissal, and suggested that they motivated his supervisor to seek his dismissal. While they are certainly permitted, they are not permissible during working hours, which he didfrom time to time.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
jurisdiction |
requiring or refusing a document |
|
Summary:
Not having the necessary equipment to play it, the Board refused in a case of misconduct to accept as evidence a tape of disciplinary interview that claimant wanted to produce as well as a transcript of it. Strict rules of evidence not to be followed. Amatter of discretion.
