Decision 20539
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 20539 | Bourgeois | English | 1991-11-04 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| reconsideration of claim | overpayment | garnishment of salary |
Summary:
The third point raised by claimant is that the Commission should not have garnisheed her salary with her new employer. Ss.127(3) quoted by the Umpire. The Commission therefore had the right to proceed as it did under the Act.
- Date modified: